Foreign Opinion about the US

While most of the issues we discuss have to do with US public opinion, I wanted to share this article that does an interesting job of explaining foreign public opinion about the US. The author offers a historical background and also comments on the United States' current status.

Nobody Likes Us? Who Cares?

By JOHN R. MILLER

Published: October 3, 2009

President Obama should focus less on global opinion and more on achieving America’s goals.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/03/opinion/03miller.html

Breaux Symposium next Friday

Clear your calendars for next Friday (and next Thursday afternoon)! This event is the most valuable opportunity you'll have in years to talk about the topics of 7005. More information is available here: http://www.lsu.edu/reillycenter/index.htm

Also, don't forget about this coming Friday, when two Senators will speak on "Civility in Public Life" at 2 pm in the Holliday Forum.

Here's an email I just got from Kirby Goidel about next Friday's Breaux Symposium:

Greetings all,
I wanted to invite everyone to attend the Breaux Symposium next Friday (October 16) in the Holliday Forum at the Manship School. This year's symposium addresses the technical challenges confronting public opinion polling and what they mean in terms of efforts to define, measure, and understand public opinion. The participants include Charlie Cook (The Cook Political Report), Mark Blumenthal (Pollster.Com), Charles Franklin (Pollster.Com), Scott Keeter (Pew Center), Anna Greenberg (Democratic political consultant), and Susan Herbst (author of several books including "Numbered Voices" and "Reading the Public").

I have attached a schedule for Friday. Please note also the reception on Thursday afternoon in the Holliday Forum. I specifically asked for the time so that faculty and grad students from mass communication and political science could have informal conversations with the panelists. Charlie Cook will also provide an overview of the 2010 elections at lunch time on Friday. (Bring a lunch).

Please let me know if you have any questions. If you would like to see the papers that have been submitted so far, just send me an email and I'll forward them. Hope to see you there!



Kirby

A word from our governor...

The Washington Post

Washington, D.C.

October 5, 2009

The Conservative Case for Reform

By Bobby Jindal
Monday, October 5, 2009 

A majority of so-called Republican strategists believe that health care is a Democratic issue. They are wrong; health care is an American issue, and the Republican Party has an opportunity to demonstrate that conservative principles work when applied to real-world problems.

But memo to Washington: The debate on health care has moved on. Democratic plans for a government takeover are passé. The people don't want it. Believe the polls, the town halls, the voters. Only Democrats in Washington would propose new taxes on businesses and families in the middle of a recession, $900 billion in new spending at a time of record deficits, and increased taxes on health insurance and products to reduce health-care costs.

Washington is the only place in the country that doesn't realize that this debate is over. Democrats may march forward anyway, but they will do so without the people, and at their own peril.

Yet hope for meaningful reform need not be lost. Only two things need to happen. First, Democrats have to give up on their grand experiment and get serious about bipartisan solutions. Second, Republicans have to join the battle of ideas.

To be clear, the Republicans in Congress who have led the opposition to the Obama-Pelosi vision of health-care reform have done the right thing for our country. If they had rolled over, the results could have been devastating for our health-care system and our nation's budget.

But Republicans must shift gears. Conservatives should seize the mantle of reform and lead. Conservatives either genuinely believe that conservative principles will work to solve real-world problems such as health care or they don't. I believe they will.

The people do not want Republicans to offer their own thousand-page plan to overhaul health care, and that is not what the nation needs.

So here are 10 ideas to increase the affordability and quality of health care. Some of these are buried within various Republican and Democratic plans that have been floated. They offer a path forward toward significant bipartisan reform. These proposals would require insurance companies to do their jobs and spread risk over large populations, restore patients' power to make their own health-care decisions, and focus our system on quality instead of activity.

-- Voluntary purchasing pools: Give individuals and small businesses the opportunities that large businesses and the government have to seek lower insurance costs.

-- Portability: As people change jobs or move across state lines, they change insurance plans. By allowing consumers to "own" their policies, insurers would have incentive to make more investments in prevention and in managing chronic conditions.

-- Lawsuit reform: It makes no sense to ignore one of the biggest cost drivers in the system -- the cost of defensive medicine, largely driven by lawsuits. Worse, many doctors have stopped performing high-risk procedures for fear of liability.

-- Require coverage of preexisting conditions: Insurance should not be least accessible when it is needed most. Companies should be incentivized to focus on delivering high-quality effective care, not to avoid covering the sick.

-- Transparency and payment reform: Consumers have more information when choosing a car or restaurant than when selecting a health-care provider. Provider quality and cost should be plainly available to consumers, and payment systems should be based on outcomes, not volume. Today's system results in wide variations in treatment instead of the consistent application of best practices. We must reward efficiency and quality.

-- Electronic medical records: The current system of paper records threatens patient privacy and leads to bad outcomes and higher costs.

-- Tax-free health savings accounts: HSAs have helped reduce costs for employers and consumers. Some businesses have seen their costs decrease by double-digit percentages. But current regulations discourage individuals and small businesses from utilizing HSAs.

-- Reward healthy lifestyle choices: Providing premium rebates and other incentives to people who make healthy choices or participate in management of their chronic diseases has been shown to reduce costs and improve health.

-- Cover young adults: A large portion of the uninsured are people who cannot afford coverage after they have "aged out" of their parents' policies. Permitting young people to stay on their parents' plans longer would reduce the number of uninsured and keep healthy people in insurance risk pools -- helping to lower premiums for everyone.

-- Refundable tax credits (for the uninsured and those who would benefit from greater flexibility of coverage): Redirecting some of the billions already spent on the uninsured will help make non-emergency care outside the emergency room affordable for millions and will provide choices of coverage through the private market rather than forcing people into a government-run system. We should trust American families to make choices for themselves while we ensure they have access to quality, affordable health care.

In short, ideas matter. The public is interested in solutions that will improve America's health-care system, not dismantle it. Republicans can lead on this.

The writer, a Republican, is governor of Louisiana.

Article

I am working on a project about politcal media literacy and I came accross this article that has a section on the "competent citzen" and I thought it went with what we are talkiing about on monday.

http://www.aocmedialiteracy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=31

Two NPR stories central to Monday's discussion theme

Remember, our theme Monday is Citizen Capacity: Can the public contribute meaningfully to democratic policy-making? These two NPR stories illustrate this question in context of the healthcare debate. 

Suggested reading & Short Overview for Monday's Class Oct 5th

Andrea Clesi and I are leading the discussion Monday. If you recall, we will be looking at the second half of Zaller and Converse's 1962 article. Some of Zaller's ideas about 2-way messaging build off of Converse's '62 work. If you haven't launched into Carpini & Keeter What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters yet, you should because it's good stuff!  And central to the THEME of our discussion Monday:  Citizen Capacity: Can the public contribute meaningfully to democratic policy-making? 

2 outside readings are suggested: 

• Walter Lippmann's 1922 book Public Opinion >  Amazon  
  
• Mass Communication and Voter Volatility, Bybee et al. (1981) Public Opinion Quarterly   Bybee, C., McLeod, J., Luetscher, W., & Garramone, G. (1981). Mass Communication and Voter Volatility. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(1), 69.